HANINA v. MCALEENAN et al
| JACKLEEN HANINA |
| KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, MARK KOUMANS and DAVID RADEL |
| L. FRANCIS CISSNA |
| 1:2019cv01646 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Dismissing action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 7/24/19. (DJS)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JACKLEEN HANINA (Rosche, Danielle) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua L. Rogers on behalf of All Defendants (Rogers, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (1) Reissued Electronically as to United States Attorney. (ztd) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE Corrected summons as to USA Liu filed by JACKLEEN HANINA.(Rosche, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to MARK KOUMANS, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, DAVID RADEL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zef, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, DAVID RADEL, MARK KOUMANS ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6166790) filed by JACKLEEN HANINA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Rosche, Danielle) (Attachment 1 replaced on 6/6/2019) (zef, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
