SOUVANNASOT v. HARVEY et al
| NIYOM SOUVANNASOT |
| EDWARD ELMHURST HOSPITAL, Dr. ELIZABETH HARVEY and ELIZABETH HARVEY |
| 1:2019cv01688 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration; denying #5 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 7/30/2019. (zsb)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #3 Memorandum & Opinion, #4 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case,, MOTION to Reopen Case by NIYOM SOUVANNASOT (zsb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 06/21/2019. (zmc)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 06/21/2019. (zmc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by NIYOM SOUVANNASOT (zmc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EDWARD ELMHURST HOSPITAL, ELIZABETH HARVEY filed by NIYOM SOUVANNASOT. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zmc) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/12/2019) (zmc). |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 06/05/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
