GANDHI v. CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES
| ASHVIN DHIREN GANDHI |
| CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES |
| 1:2019cv01701 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report by October 1, 2019, updating court on production of records and recommending a schedule for further proceedings, if necessary. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 8/2/2019. (lcapm2)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 10/1/2019. (zjd) |
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT by CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES. (Taaffe, Damon) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Damon William Taaffe on behalf of CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (Taaffe, Damon) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. Both a Complaint and an Answer are now before the court in this FOIA case. It is hereby ordered that the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before August 1, 2019. The Joint Status Report shall include (1) the status of Plaintiffs FOIA request; (2) the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiffs FOIA request; (3) the anticipated date(s) for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff; (4) whether a motion for stay is likely under Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976); and (5) whether the parties anticipate summary judgment briefing and, if so, a proposed briefing schedule. Please see the attached Order for details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 7/18/2019. (lcapm2)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 8/1/2019. (zjd) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES.(Taaffe, Damon) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zef, ) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by ASHVIN DHIREN GANDHI.(Stotter, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6180482) filed by ASHVIN DHIREN GANDHI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stotter, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GANDHI v. CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ASHVIN DHIREN GANDHI | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Stotter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES | |
| Represented By: | Damon William Taaffe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
