CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING et al v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Matthew Smith and CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING |
DEPARTMENT OF STATE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE |
1:2019cv01726 |
June 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Trevor N McFadden |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 8/30/2019. (hmc) |
MINUTE ORDER. Before the Court are a Complaint and an Answer in this FOIA case. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report proposing a schedule for proceeding in this matter. The schedule should address, among other things, the status of Plaintiff's FOIA request, the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request, the anticipated date(s) for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff, whether a motion for an Open America stay is likely in this case, whether a Vaughn index will be required in this case, and a briefing schedule for dispositive motions, if required. The parties shall file the schedule on or before August 30, 2019. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 7/19/2019. (lctnm2) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE.(Valdez, Darrell) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Darrell C. Valdez on behalf of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Valdez, Darrell) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 6/18/2019. (Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/18/2019.) RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 6/18/2019. RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 6/20/2019. (See docket entries #5 #6 and #7 to view document). (tth) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia by CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING, MATTHEW SMITH. (Clopper, John) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to U.S. Attorney General by CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING, MATTHEW SMITH. (Clopper, John) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to U.S. Department of State by CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING, MATTHEW SMITH. (Clopper, John) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 06/14/2019. (lctnm2) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zef, ) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING (Clopper, John) (Main Document 2 replaced on 6/14/2019) (zef, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF STATE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6186635) filed by CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING, Matthew Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to 3 to complaint)(Clopper, John) (Attachment 1 replaced on 6/14/2019) (zef, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.