UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HARRIS CORPORATION et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| HARRIS CORPORATION and L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| 1:2019cv01809 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Thomas F Hogan |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF TUNNEY ACT REQUIREMENTS by L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. (Ellis, Abram) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF TUNNEY ACT REQUIREMENTS by HARRIS CORPORATION. (Matelis, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Abram J. Ellis on behalf of L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Ellis, Abram) |
Filing 5
HOLD SEPARATE STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on June 24, 2019. (lctfh4).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph James Matelis, II on behalf of HARRIS CORPORATION (Matelis, Joseph) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Thomas F. Hogan. (zeg) |
| Filing 3 COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Quin, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF TUNNEY ACT REQUIREMENTS by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Hold Separate Stipulation and Proposed Order)(Quin, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Quin, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
