PLUMMER v. MURPHY et al
| Derek Plummer and DEREK L. PLUMMER |
| Franklin Myers, Mark J Murphy, MARK MURPHY, JOSHUA HAUHN and SHIBY CHACKO |
| 1:2019cv01825 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Emmet G Sullivan |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Counsel/Party (zrdj) |
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER: The parties are directed to read the attached Standing Order Governing Civil Cases Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in its entirety upon receipt. The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives in the attached Standing Order. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 07/01/19. (Attachment: Exhibit 1) (mac)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. (zeg) |
| Filing 4 ERRATA by Mark J Murphy. (Murphy, Mark) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Mark J Murphy, Franklin Myers.(Murphy, Mark) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Plaintiff of Removal of Action by Mark J Murphy re #1 Notice of Removal, (Murphy, Mark) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 18-CA-008370 Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0090-6205533 filed by Mark J Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Superior Court Documents, #3 Notice to Counsel/Party)(Murphy, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
