BRIDGES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
| RICHARD BRIDGES |
| U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CONSULATE, CASABLANCA, MOROCCO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, U.S. CONSULATE, MICHAEL POMPEO and L. FRANCIS CISSNA |
| 1:2019cv01939 |
| June 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KEVIN MCALEENAN, MICHAEL POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CONSULATE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zeg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6220427) filed by RICHARD BRIDGES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons)(Hacking, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/1/2019) (zeg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
