CALHOUN-EL v. BOWSER et al
| JAMES CALHOUN-EL |
| QUINCY L. BOOTH, RANDY HOLLEY, KEISHA GORDAN, JOHNSON LENNARD, MURIEL BOWSER, COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP, DIRECTOR and LENNARD JOHNSON |
| 1:2019cv01983 |
| July 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER granting, for good cause shown, Defendants' #3 Motion for Extension of Time. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants Holley and Gordan shall respond to Plaintiff's complaint by September 9, 2019. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 7/10/2019. (lctjk3)
|
| Filing 4 ERRATA by KEISHA GORDAN, RANDY HOLLEY #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by KEISHA GORDAN, RANDY HOLLEY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Adebonojo, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by KEISHA GORDAN, RANDY HOLLEY (Adebonojo, Kenneth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Counsel/Party (zrdj) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zrdj) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2019 CA 002269 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by KEISHA GORDAN, RANDY HOLLEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Adebonojo, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
