BRYANT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
JAMES B BRYANT and JAMES B. BRYANT |
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY |
1:2019cv02004 |
July 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Trevor N McFadden |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 9/6/2019. (hmc) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY.(Rogers, Joshua) |
MINUTE ORDER. Before the Court are a complaint and an answer in this FOIA case. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report proposing a schedule for proceeding in this matter. The schedule should address, among other things, the status of Plaintiff's FOIA request, the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request, the anticipated date(s) for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff, whether a motion for an Open America stay is likely in this case, whether a Vaughn index will be required in this case, and a briefing schedule for dispositive motions, if required. The parties shall file the schedule on or before September 6, 2019. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 08/05/2019. (lctnm1) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua L. Rogers on behalf of DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (Rogers, Joshua) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. (Eatinger, Robert) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY served on 7/9/2019, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 7/09/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Eatinger, Robert) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 7/9/2019. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 8/8/2019. (Eatinger, Robert) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent) (tth) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE with corrected address re #1 Complaint filed by JAMES B BRYANT. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by JAMES B BRYANT.(Eatinger, Robert) |
NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: re Notice of Corrected Docket Entry was entered in error. (tth) |
ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: re #2 Request for Summons to Issue was entered in error at the request of counsel. Said pleading was refiled as docket entry #4 . (tth) Modified on 7/11/2019 (znmw). |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 7/8/2019. (lctnm2) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by JAMES B BRYANT. (Attachments: #1 Summons Corrected Summons Form, #2 Summons Corrected Summons Form)(Eatinger, Robert); Modified on 7/9/2019, Entered in Error was removed. |
Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zeg) |
SUMMONS Not Issued as to DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (zeg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6235322) filed by JAMES B BRYANT. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Eatinger, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.