CARTER v. SAUL
TOMMY CARTER |
ANDREW SAUL |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2019cv02049 |
July 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
James E Boasberg |
Robin M Meriweather |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XV1 |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather for full case management. (zad) |
Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING Case to Random Magistrate Judge for Full Case Management. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 7/26/2019. (lcjeb2) |
Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zmc) |
Filing 6 FIAT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. "Leave to file without prepayment of costs GRANTED," Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 07/24/2019. (zmc) Modified to add text on 8/27/2019 (znmw). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance- Pro Bono by Curt D. Campbell, Jr on behalf of TOMMY CARTER (zrdj) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance- Pro Bono by Jennifer F. Mezey on behalf of TOMMY CARTER (zrdj) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Heuer Levy on behalf of TOMMY CARTER (zrdj) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TOMMY CARTER (zrdj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL filed by TOMMY CARTER.(zrdj) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 7/10/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrdj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.