KAR et al v. IRAN et al
| AZADEH POURZAND and MEHRANGIZ KAR |
| IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and SEYED ALI HOSSEINI KHAMENEI |
| 1:2019cv02070 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1605 A |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by MEHRANGIZ KAR.(Herischi, Ali)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 plaintiffs' motion for waiver of Local Civil Rules 5.1(c) and 11.1. See text of Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 7/24/2019. (lcjdb2)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zeg)
|
|
Filing 2
Ex Parte MOTION for Waiver OF LOCAL CIVIL RULES 5.1(c)(1) AND 11.1 by MEHRANGIZ KAR, AZADEH POURZAND (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Herischi, Ali)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6248814) filed by MEHRANGIZ KAR, AZADEH POURZAND. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Herischi, Ali)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
