VILLEDA AGUSTIN v. SHAY CONSTRUCTION et al
ALEX RONALDO VILLEDA AGUSTIN |
GARY JAMES SHAY and SHAY CONSTRUCTION |
1:2019cv02126 |
July 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Timothy J Kelly |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by GARY JAMES SHAY, SHAY CONSTRUCTION.(Wilson, Albert) |
MINUTE ORDER granting, for good cause shown, Defendants' #11 Consent Motion to Set Aside Default. It is hereby ORDERED that the #7 Entry of Default against Defendants is VACATED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants shall file their response to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint by September 18, 2019. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 9/11/2019. (lctjk1) |
MINUTE ORDER: An Initial Scheduling Conference is set for October 15, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 11. The parties shall meet, confer, and submit a joint report pursuant to FRCP 26(f) and Local Rule 16.3. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 9/11/19. (lctjk1) |
Filing 11 Consent MOTION to Set Aside Default by GARY JAMES SHAY, SHAY CONSTRUCTION (Attachments: #1 Proposed Answer, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilson, Albert) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION by GARY JAMES SHAY, SHAY CONSTRUCTION re #8 MOTION to Dismiss (Wilson, Albert) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Albert Wilson, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Wilson, Albert) |
MINUTE ORDER: The Clerk's Office shall enter Defendants' "Response and Motion to Dismiss" as a motion to dismiss the complaint on behalf of Defendant Gary James Shay only. The Court so orders without any determination as to whether the motion was timely filed. Because corporations cannot represent themselves or appear pro se, however, any response by Defendant Shay Corporation must be filed by an attorney. See Lennon v. McClory, 3 F. Supp. 2d 1461, 1462 n.1 (D.D.C. 1998). Absent counsel, default judgment may be entered against a corporate defendant. Id. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 8/27/2019. (lctjk1) |
Filing 8 WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO NOTICE FILED ON 9/6/2019..... MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by GARY JAMES SHAY. "Leave to file GRANTED in part and DENIED in part." By Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 8/26/19. (ztth); Modified on 9/9/2019 (ztth). |
Filing 7 VACATED PURSUANT ORDER FILED ON 9/11/2019.....TO Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to GARY JAMES SHAY, SHAY CONSTRUCTION (znmw); Modified on 9/12/2019 (ztth). |
Filing 6 MILITARY AFFIDAVIT by ALEX RONALDO VILLEDA AGUSTIN. (See Docket Entry #5 to view document). (znmw) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Entry of Default against Defendants by ALEX RONALDO VILLEDA AGUSTIN (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Military Service Affidavit)(Amster, Michael) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. GARY JAMES SHAY served on 7/24/2019, answer due 8/14/2019 (Amster, Michael) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SHAY CONSTRUCTION served on 7/24/2019, answer due 8/14/2019 (Amster, Michael) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to GARY JAMES SHAY, SHAY CONSTRUCTION. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zeg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6260906) filed by ALEX RONALDO VILLEDA AGUSTIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons for Shay Construction, #3 Summons Summons for Gary James Shay)(Amster, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.