ROGERS v. POMPEO
RYLAND WILCOX ROGERS |
MIKE POMPEO |
1:2019cv02141 |
July 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ryland Wilcox Rogers v. Mike Pompeo, case number 2019 CA 001708 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by MIKE POMPEO. (Attachments: #1 DC Superior Court Complaint, #2 Westfall Certification, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hair, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ROGERS v. POMPEO | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RYLAND WILCOX ROGERS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MIKE POMPEO | |
Represented By: | Christopher Charles Hair |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.