YOUNG v. PERDUE
| Richard V Young and RICHARD V. YOUNG |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and SONNY PERDUE |
| 1:2019cv02144 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 7/29/2019. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/27/2019.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 07/29/2019., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SONNY PERDUE served on 7/31/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Brown Gaines, Eden)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to SONNY PERDUE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zeg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6264600) filed by Richard V Young. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Brown Gaines, Eden)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
