NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS |
| UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE |
| 1:2019cv02236 |
| July 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Royce C Lamberth |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 39 U.S.C. ยง 0409 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE served on 8/2/2019 (Freeman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 8
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 08/02/2019. (Freeman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/2/2019. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/1/2019. (Freeman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew D. Freeman on behalf of NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS (Freeman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrdj)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 07/30/2019. (lcrcl2)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zrdj)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS. Attorney Joseph B. Espo terminated. (Espo, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Andrew D. Freeman, :Firm- Brown, Goldstein & Levy LLP, :Address- 120 E. Baltimore Street, Suite 1700, Baltimore, MD 21202. Phone No. - (410) 962-1030. Fax No. - (410) 385-0869 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-6284072. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Zachariasiewicz, Jean)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Jean M. Zachariasiewicz on behalf of NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS (Zachariasiewicz, Jean)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6282161) filed by NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Espo, Joseph)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | |
| Represented By: | Joseph B. Espo |
| Represented By: | Andrew D. Freeman |
| Represented By: | Jean M. Zachariasiewicz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
