JOHNSON v. SYDELL GROUP LLC
| DARIUS JOHNSON |
| ADAMS MORGAN HOTEL OPERATED LLC and SYDELL GROUP LLC |
| 1:2019cv02257 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12188 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE by DARIUS JOHNSON. ADAMS MORGAN HOTEL OPERATED LLC waiver sent on 8/6/2019, answer due 10/5/2019. (Lee, C.) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 8/7/2019. (lctnm3)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to SYDELL GROUP LLC. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zeg) |
| Filing 2 Amended COMPLAINT against SYDELL GROUP LLC with Jury Demand filed by DARIUS Modified on 8/7/2019 (zrdj). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADAMS MORGAN HOTEL OPERATED LLC with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6284561) filed by DARIUS JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Lee, C.) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/13/2019) (znmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
