PINNEY v. BRIDENSTINE
| PATRICIA PINNEY and PATRICIA L. PINNEY |
| Administrator James Bridenstine and JAMES F. BRIDENSTINE |
| 1:2019cv02259 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Ketanji Brown Jackson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER AND GUIDELINES FOR CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON. The Court will hold the parties and counsel responsible for following these directives, and parties and counsel should pay particular attention to the Court's instructions for briefing motions and filing exhibits. Failure to adhere to this Order may, when appropriate, result the imposition of sanctions and/or sua sponte denial of non-conforming motions. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 8/26/2019. (lckbj1)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to JAMES F. BRIDENSTINE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. (zeg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Bridenstine with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6284814) filed by PATRICIA PINNEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Johnson, Nathaniel) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/31/2019) (zeg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
