CARMICHAEL v. POMPEO
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RICHARD POMPEO and DAVID ALAN CARMICHAEL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 1:2019cv02316
Filed: July 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Rudolph Contreras
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Joinder by DAVID ALAN CARMICHAEL. (Attachment: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (ztth)
September 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MICHAEL RICHARD POMPEO served on 9/13/2019; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA served on 9/13/2019, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 9/13/19., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/13/2019. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/12/2019.) (ztd)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by DAVID ALAN CARMICHAEL (Attachments: #1 Summons)(ztd)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order SUMMONS (3) Issued as to MICHAEL RICHARD POMPEO, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ztth)
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED - Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, and Waiver of the Service Summons. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. "Leave to File Denied. The parties may not communicate with the Court by letter. Local Rules. In order to effect service, plaintiff must request summonses from the Clerk's Office, and serve the United States pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 (i), including in this case, service on Department of State, Department of Justice, Attorney General, and U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia Attention Civil Process Clerk. A plaintiff may not use the waiver of service provisions to serve the United States." Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/23/2019. (ztth)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL RICHARD POMPEO (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616100029) filed by DAVID ALAN CARMICHAEL. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (tth)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Not Issued as to MICHAEL RICHARD POMPEO. (tth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CARMICHAEL v. POMPEO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RICHARD POMPEO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID ALAN CARMICHAEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?