MAKELL v. FEDCHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
STACEY A. MAKELL |
FEDCHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and CU MEMBERS MORTGAGE COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A. |
1:2019cv02364 |
August 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Timothy J Kelly |
Real Property: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons (3) Issued as to CU MEMBERS MORTGAGE COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A., FEDCHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL CREDIT UNION. (zeg) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying #3 Motion for TRO. (See order for details) Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 08/13/2019. (zsb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zsb) |
Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by STACEY A. MAKELL (zsb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by STACEY A. MAKELL (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CU MEMBERS MORTGAGE COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A., FEDCHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL CREDIT UNION with Jury Demand filed by STACEY A. MAKELL. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsb) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 08/06/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.