SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CRYSTAL WORLD HOLDINGS, INC. et al
| SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| THE NEW SPORTS ECONOMY INSTITUTE, CRYSTAL WORLD HOLDINGS, INC., CHRISTOPHER PAUL RABALAIS and NEW SPORTS ECONOMY INSTITUTE |
| 1:2019cv02490 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zmc) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE by SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. CRYSTAL WORLD HOLDINGS, INC. waiver sent on 8/19/2019, answer due 10/18/2019; CHRISTOPHER PAUL RABALAIS waiver sent on 8/19/2019, answer due 10/18/2019; THE NEW SPORTS ECONOMY INSTITUTE waiver sent on 8/19/2019, answer due 10/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service as to Defendant Crystal World Holdings, #2 Waiver of Service as to Defendant The New Sports Economy Institute, #3 Waiver of Service as to Defendant Christopher Paul Rabalais)(Costello, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Costello, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
