SMITH v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
| GRANT F. SMITH |
| INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
| 1:2019cv02516 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Use Post Office Box and Agent Address. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff may use his post address box address for FOIA-related legal filings in this suit. It is FURTHER ORDERED that his contact information for such purposes is Grant F. Smith, IRmep, PO Box 32041, Washington, DC 20007, and that Plaintiff's designated phone number is (202) 342-7325. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on October 7, 2019. (lcrc3)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer, and jointly submit a proposed briefing schedule by October 21, 2019. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on October 7, 2019. (lcrc3)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Motion for CM/ECF Access. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff, having complied with the requirements of Local Civil Rule 5.4(b)(2), shall be granted a CM/ECF user name and password. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on October 7, 2019. (lcrc3)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE re #5 Answer to Complaint . (Tobin, Olga) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.(Tobin, Olga) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/26/2019. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/25/2019.) RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 8/26/2019. (ztth) |
| SUMMONS (3) Issued as to INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ztth) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by GRANT F. SMITH. (Attachment: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (tth) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Permission to Use Post Office Box by GRANT F. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (tth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616100288) filed by GRANT F. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (tth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SMITH v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GRANT F. SMITH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | Olga L. Tobin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
