HUNT v. UNITED STATES, INC. et al
| MICHAEL E. HUNT, MICHAEL EUGENE HUNT and HUNT MICHAEL E. |
| NORTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES, INC. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2019cv02544 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 9/30/19. (zmd)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 9/30/19. (zmd) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by MICHAEL E. HUNT (zeg) . |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL E. HUNT (zeg) . |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NORTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES, INC. with Jury Demand filed by MICHAEL E. HUNT.(zeg). |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 8/19/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zeg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
