DOWNS v. GREENSBURG CONCRETE BLOCK et al
| ADAM M. DOWNS |
| EDWARD REPASKY, JR. and GREENSBURG CONCRETE BLOCK |
| 1:2019cv02589 |
| August 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Richard J Leon |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1381 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 09/24/2019. (lcrjl3)
|
| Filing 4 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record as to Greensburg Concrete Block by ADAM M. DOWNS. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Ray, James) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. GREENSBURG CONCRETE BLOCK served on 9/5/2019, answer due 9/26/2019; EDWARD REPASKY, JR served on 9/5/2019, answer due 9/26/2019 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Certificate of Service)(Ray, James) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to GREENSBURG CONCRETE BLOCK, EDWARD REPASKY, JR. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6344908), REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by ADAM M. DOWNS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Ray, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
