PRZEWOZMAN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
TZVI YOSEF PRZEWOZMAN, CHAIM DOV PRZEWOZMAN, SARA PRZEWOZMAN-ROZENBAUM, HADASSAH PRZEWOZMAN, YAFA PRZEWOZMAN, CHAYA PRZEWOZMAN, CHAYA RACHEL PRZEWOZMAN and ESTATE OF PINCHES MENACHEM PRZEWOZMAN |
The Iranian Ministry of Information & Security, THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN |
1:2019cv02601 |
August 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1605 A |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiffs' Addresses Under Seal by CHAIM DOV PRZEWOZMAN, CHAYA PRZEWOZMAN, HADASSAH PRZEWOZMAN, TZVI YOSEF PRZEWOZMAN, YAFA PRZEWOZMAN, SARA PRZEWOZMAN-ROZENBAUM (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Miller, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, The Iranian Ministry of Information & Security ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6347142) filed by TZVI YOSEF PRZEWOZMAN, CHAYA PRZEWOZMAN, HADASSAH PRZEWOZMAN, CHAIM DOV PRZEWOZMAN, SARA PRZEWOZMAN-ROZENBAUM, YAFA PRZEWOZMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Miller, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.