HENSON v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY et al
Belinda Henson |
Marie Newman, Alfred Michael, HOWARD UNIVERSITY, HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and HOWARD UNIV. FACULTY PRACTICE PLN. |
1:2019cv02734 |
September 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
James E Boasberg |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (through November 11) by HOWARD UNIV. FACULTY PRACTICE PLN., HOWARD UNIVERSITY, HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, ALFRED MICHAEL, MARIE NEWMAN (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Arnold, Ariana) |
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Consent #8 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file their Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by November 11, 2019. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 11/5/2019. (lcjeb1) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 11/5/2019. (nbn) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer or otherwise Respond by 11/1/2019. (nbn) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (November 1) by HOWARD UNIV. FACULTY PRACTICE PLN., HOWARD UNIVERSITY, HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, ALFRED MICHAEL, MARIE NEWMAN (Arnold, Ariana) |
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Consent #7 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file their Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by November 1, 2019. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/24/2019. (lcjeb1) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 10/18/2019. (nbn) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer through October 18, 2019 by HOWARD UNIV. FACULTY PRACTICE PLN., HOWARD UNIVERSITY, HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, ALFRED MICHAEL, MARIE NEWMAN (Arnold, Ariana) |
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Consent #6 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file their Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by October 18, 2019. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/8/2019. (lcjeb1) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 10/3/2019. (znbn) |
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Consent #4 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendants shall file their Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by October 3, 2019. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 09/23/2019. (lcjeb1) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Complaint, (zeg) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by HOWARD UNIVERSITY, Alfred Michael, Marie Newman (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Arnold, Ariana) |
Filing 3 ERRATA re Caption on removal by HOWARD UNIVERSITY, Alfred Michael, Marie Newman Notice of Corrected Docket Entry. (Arnold, Ariana) |
Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zeg) |
NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: re #2 Notice (Other) was entered in error as duplicative.(zeg) |
Filing 2 ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE of Removal by HOWARD UNIVERSITY re #1 Complaint, (Attachments: #1 Complaint as served on Howard)(Arnold, Ariana) Modified on 9/16/2019 (zeg). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by HOWARD UNIVERSITY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6374213) from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2019 CA 002707 B filed by HOWARD UNIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Complaint as served on Howard, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice filed with DC Superior Court)(Arnold, Ariana) Modified on 9/16/2019 to correct docket entry text (zeg). (Attachment 2 replaced on 9/18/2019) (zeg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.