BOZGOZ et al v. HAYNES et al
| 1:2019cv02790 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons set forth in the attached Opinion, the Court will GRANT Defendants' motion to dismiss, Dkt. 38; will DISMISS the complaint, Dkt. 1; and will DENY Plaintiffs' motion to transfer, Dkt. 50. A separate order will issue. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 09/17/2021. (lcrdm3)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, it is hereby ORDERED that that Plaintiffs' motions, Dkt. 25 ; Dkt. 26 ; Dkt. 27 ; Dkt. 28 ; Dkt. 30 ; Dkt. 31 , are DENIED. It is further ORDERED, upon consideration of the Fed eral Defendants' status report, Dkt. 32 , that the Federal Defendants shall file any motion to dismiss in this action on or before May 7, 2021. Finally, it is ORDERED that the non-federal Defendants in this case--Khalil James, Tracy D'Sou za, J. Gray, Tawana Holland, and John McCarthy--are dismissed without prejudice in light of Plaintiffs' failure to serve them in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 4/16/2021. (lcrdm3)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, Plaintiffs' motion to recuse, Dkt. 8 , motion for acceptance of substitute service, Dkt. 9 , motion to transfer case, Dkt. 10 , and motion to amend/ correct complaint, Dkt. 11 , are hereby DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file a status report on or before August 18, 2020 indicating which, if any, of the federal defendants that office represents for purpos es of this proceeding and whether, as to each such defendant, the defendant contests service. It if further ORDERED that, if any such defendant contests service, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file a motion raising any such defense on or befo re September 4, 2020. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file proof of service with respect to the remaining non-federal defendants on or before August 25, 2020. Plaintiffs are cautioned that, if they fail to file proof of proper service o f process by that date as to any of the remaining non-federal defendants, or fail to show good cause by August 25, 2020 why the Court should further extend that deadline, the Court "must dismiss the action without prejudice against any such defe ndant" pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). It if further ORDERED that Plaintiffs' remaining pending motions, Dkt. 12 , Dkt. 14 , Dkt. 16 , are DENIED as premature in light of the uncertainty with respect to the sufficiency of Plaintiffs' efforts to serve the defendants newly named in the Fourth Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 8/4/20. (lcrdm3, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BOZGOZ et al v. HAYNES et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
