AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
| AMERICAN OVERSIGHT |
| GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE |
| 1:2019cv02814 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Dabney L Friedrich |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY.(Sverdlov, Alexander) |
MINUTE ORDER requiring the parties to MEET AND CONFER and file a joint status report proposing a schedule for further proceedings. The status report should address the status of the plaintiff's FOIA request, including the anticipated number of documents responsive to the request and the anticipated date(s) for release of the requested documents. The parties shall file the joint status report on or before December 2, 2019. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on November 4, 2019. (lcdlf3)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER granting the defendants' #6 Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Accordingly, the defendants shall file a response on or before November 4, 2019. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on October 22, 2019. (lcdlf3)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (Sverdlov, Alexander) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander V. Sverdlov on behalf of All Defendants (Sverdlov, Alexander) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/20/2019. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/20/2019.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 9/30/2019., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION served on 9/27/2019; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE served on 9/27/2019; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT served on 9/27/2019; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY served on 9/30/2019 (McGrath, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zeg) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT (McGrath, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6385773) filed by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(McGrath, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
