BROWN v. WMATA
| DAVID W. BROWN |
| WMATA |
| 1:2019cv02853 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) GRANTING defendant's #16 Consent Motion for Extension of Time, and DIRECTING the defendant to file its reply, if any, in support of its #8 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to plaintiff's #14 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by November 26, 2019, and further DIRECTING the plaintiff to file its reply, if any, in support of its #14 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by December 12, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on November 15, 2019. (lcbah4)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant's opposition to Plaintiff's #14 Cross-Motion and Reply, if any, in support of its #8 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment due by 11/26/2019; plaintiff's reply, if any, in support of its #14 Cross-Motion due by 12/12/2019. (tg) |
| Filing 16 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #14 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and in support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment by WMATA (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wolverton, Caroline) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant's opposition to plaintiff's #14 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and reply, if any, to plaintiff's #13 opposition due by 11/19/2019; plaintiff's reply, if any, to defendant's response to plaintiff's cross-motion due by 12/5/2019. (tg) |
|
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) GRANTING plaintiff's #15 Consent Nunc Pro Tunc Motion for Brief Final Enlargement of Time to File Opposition to Defendant's #8 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, and ORDERING plaintiff's #13 Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's #8 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment be deemed timely filed, and further DIRECTING the defendant to file its reply, if any, to plaintiff's #13 Opposition and its response to plaintiff's #14 Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by November 19, 2019, and further DIRECTING the plaintiff to file its reply, if any, to defendant's response by December 5, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on October 31, 2019. (lcbah4)
|
| Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative MOTION for Summary Judgment (Nunc Pro Tunc) by DAVID W. BROWN (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McClanahan, Kelly) |
| Filing 14 Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by DAVID W. BROWN (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Wolverton-McClanahan email, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(McClanahan, Kelly) |
| Filing 13 Memorandum in opposition to re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by DAVID W. BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Wolverton-McClanahan email, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(McClanahan, Kelly) |
|
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) GRANTING plaintiff's #12 Consent Motion for Further Enlargement of Time to File Opposition to Defendant's #8 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file a response by October 25, 2019. Defendant shall file its reply, if any, by November 12, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on October 24, 2019. (lcbah4)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's response to dispositive motion due by 10/25/2019; Defendant's reply, if any, due by 11/12/2019. (tg) |
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative MOTION for Summary Judgment by DAVID W. BROWN (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McClanahan, Kelly) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's response to dispositive motion due by 10/23/2019; Defendant's reply, if any, due by 11/7/2019. (tg) |
|
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) GRANTING Plaintiff's #11 Consent Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Opposition to Defendant's #8 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file a response by October 23, 2019. Defendant shall file its reply, if any, by November 7, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on October 16, 2019. (lcbah4)
|
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative MOTION for Summary Judgment by DAVID W. BROWN (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McClanahan, Kelly) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on October 4, 2019. (lcbah4)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly Brian McClanahan on behalf of DAVID W. BROWN (McClanahan, Kelly) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment by WMATA (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Lynn Bowersox, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Wolverton, Caroline) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Caroline Lewis Wolverton on behalf of WMATA (Wolverton, Caroline) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (zeg) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (zeg) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by WMATA re #3 Errata, #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Errata, #4 Errata . (Wolverton, Caroline) |
| Filing 4 ERRATA by WMATA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wolverton, Caroline) |
| Filing 3 ERRATA by WMATA. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Superior Court Documents Initial Order, #3 Superior Court Documents Complaint, #4 Superior Court Documents Summons, #5 Superior Court Documents Information Sheet, #6 Superior Court Documents Notice and Acknowledgment of Service, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wolverton, Caroline) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA by WMATA. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Documents D.C. Superior Court Initial Order)(Wolverton, Caroline) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2019 CA 005536B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0090-6393870 filed by WMATA. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Documents Complaint, #2 Superior Court Documents Summons, #3 Superior Court Documents Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Superior Court Documents Notice and Acknowledgement of Service)(Wolverton, Caroline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BROWN v. WMATA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WMATA | |
| Represented By: | Caroline Lewis Wolverton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID W. BROWN | |
| Represented By: | Kelly Brian McClanahan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
