KHAN et al v. MCALEENAN et al
| MUHAMMAD JAFAR KHAN and UMMAMA J KHAN |
| KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, WILLIAM P. BARR and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN |
| 1:2019cv02854 |
| September 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN and U.S. Attorney (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 09/26/2019. (lcrdm2, )
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zeg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6394015) filed by MUHAMMAD JAFAR KHAN, UMMAMA J KHAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit INDEX OF EXHIBITS, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #6 Summons SUMMONS-US ATT, #7 Summons SUMMONS-MCALEENAN, #8 Summons SUMMONS-CUCCINELLI, #9 Summons SUMMONS-BARR)(Jeelani, Hashim) (Attachment 5 replaced on 9/26/2019) (zeg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
