MONTGOMERY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
SANDY DENISE MONTGOMERY and SANDY MONTGOMERY |
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CONSULATE, CASABLANCA, MOROCCO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, U.S. CONSULATE, KEVIN MCALEENAN and MICHAEL RICHARD POMPEO |
1:2019cv02859 |
September 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Christopher R Cooper |
Other Statutory Actions |
8 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 SUMMONS (10)Issued Electronically as to KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, KEVIN MCALEENAN, MICHAEL POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CONSULATE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zeg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6395095) filed by SANDY DENISE MONTGOMERY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons)(Hacking, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/26/2019) (zeg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.