LITTLE v. UNITED STATES
| RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ |
| UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS |
| MARVIN C. LITTLE |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2019cv02866 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #4 Motion to Set Aside without prejudice, and it is further ORDERED that within 30 days of entry of this order, petitioner shall file a concise single amended petition (see order for details). Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 11/08/2019. (adh, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Set Aside Sentence Pursuant to 28 USC 2254 filed by MARVIN C. LITTLE. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit) (zsb) Modified text on 10/11/2019 (znmw). |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by MARVIN C. LITTLE (zsb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARVIN C. LITTLE (zsb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MARVIN C. LITTLE. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 09/20/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
