MARIN TRIANA v. OAS GROUP, INC. et al
RAUL MARIN TRIANA |
GUAN YUN ZHU, GARY S NGO, PDDC, INC., EASON ZHU, OAS GROUP, INC., GARY S. NGO, PDDC, INC. doing business as POKI DC DOWNTOWN and OAS GROUP, INC. doing business as POKI DISTRICT |
1:2019cv03120 |
October 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Tanya S Chutkan |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: A Scheduling Conference is hereby set for 1/14/20 at 10:45 am in Courtroom 9. No later than 1/6/20 the parties shall file their joint Report of the Parties' Planning Meeting, pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 16.3. The Report shall include a proposed Scheduling Order in the format found on Judge Chutkan's court webpage, along with any proposed changes which shall be highlighted. On the same day that the parties file their Rule 26 report and proposed Scheduling Order, the parties shall also email a Word version of the proposed order to Chambers. When proposing deadlines, the parties shall avoid proposing a schedule that contains submission of simultaneous dispositive cross-motions. In addition to the requirements under the Federal and Local Rules, the parties' report shall contain a succinct summary of the case and the statutory basis for all causes of action and defenses. Counsel who attend the Scheduling Conference must be sufficiently familiar with the case to answer any questions which arise and hold the authority to make stipulations and admissions about all matters that can reasonably be anticipated for discussion. Parties are encouraged to attend, but are not required to do so. Separate Reports will be stricken, sua sponte. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 12/13/19. (DJS) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by GARY S. NGO, OAS GROUP, INC., PDDC, INC., GUAN YUN ZHU.(Amourgis, Edward) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Michael Hsur, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-6636158. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by GARY S. NGO, OAS GROUP, INC., PDDC, INC., GUAN YUN ZHU (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Amourgis, Edward) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Response to Show Cause due by 12/19/2019. (tb) |
MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff filed this action on 10/17/2019. It appears from the record that Plaintiff effectuated service of process on the Defendants as late as 11/2/2019, but Defendants have yet to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before 12/19/19, why this action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff's failure to satisfactorily respond to the present order by 12/19/19, may result in the dismissal of this action, without further notice, for failure to prosecute. See Local Civil Rule 83.23. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 12/6/19. (DJS) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. PDDC, INC. served on 11/2/2019, answer due 11/23/2019 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. GUAN YUN ZHU served on 10/22/2019, answer due 11/12/2019 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. GARY S NGO served on 10/22/2019, answer due 11/12/2019 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. OAS GROUP, INC. served on 10/22/2019, answer due 11/12/2019 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to GARY S NGO, OAS GROUP, INC., PDDC, INC., GUAN YUN ZHU. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc) |
Case assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6459092) filed by RAUL MARIN TRIANA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons (4))(Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.