FAJANA v. HOWARD et al
| PAUL A FAJANA and PAUL A. FAJANA |
| CLERK OF THE U.S. DIST. COURT, JUAN R. TORRUELLA, WILLIAM J KAYATTA, JEFFREY R HOWARD, RYAN W ZOBEL, WILLIAM J. KAYATTA, JEFFREY R. HOWARD and RYAN W. ZOBEL |
| 1:2019cv03160 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Application to proceed in forma pauperis; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED with prejudice. This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P.4(a). SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 10/31/2019. (zad)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 10/31/2019. (zad) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by PAUL A FAJANA (adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLERK OF THE U.S. DIST. COURT, JEFFREY R HOWARD, WILLIAM J KAYATTA, JUAN R. TORRUELLA, RYAN W ZOBEL with Jury Demand filed by PAUL A FAJANA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(adh, ) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 10/16/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
