TEN-HOOPEN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
| VINCENT C. TEN-HOOPEN |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PARKLND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and PARKLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL |
| 1:2019cv03208 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by VINCENT C. TEN-HOOPEN (zsb) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by VINCENT C. TEN-HOOPEN (adh, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. SO ORDERED. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 11/8/19. (zmd)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 11/8/19. (zmd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by VINCENT C. TEN-HOOPEN (zrdj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PARKLND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION filed by VINCENT C. TEN-HOOPEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zrdj) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 10/25/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrdj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
