DOE v. CHUNG
| JANE DOE |
| DAVID CHUNG |
| 1:2019cv03266 |
| October 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's time to effectuate service due by 1/27/2020. (hmc) |
MINUTE ORDER. The Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on October 28, 2019. As of the date of this Order, the public docket reflects that the Plaintiff has yet to file proof of service of the Defendant. The Court directs the Plaintiff's attention to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and Local Civil Rule 5.3. It is hereby ORDERED that, by no later than January 27, 2020, the Plaintiff must either cause process to be served upon the Defendant and file proof of service with the Court or establish good cause for the failure to do so. Failure to make such filings will result in dismissal of this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 12/20/2019. (lctnm2)
|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to DAVID CHUNG. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(ztth) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE Complaint filed by JANE DOE.(Dunn, Christine) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 11/1/2019. (lctnm2)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Seal ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on 10/30/2019. (zsb) (Main Document 6 replaced on 11/4/2019) (zsb).
|
| Filing 5 SEALED COMPLAINT filed by JANE DOE re #4 MOTION to Seal filed by JANE DOE. (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.) (ztth) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Seal by JANE DOE. (Attachment: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (ztth); Modified text on 10/31/2019 (ztth). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on 10/29/2019. (ztth)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym by JANE DOE. (ztth); Modified Date Filed on 10/31/2019 (ztth). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DAVID CHUNG (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616) with Jury Demand filed by JANE DOE. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ztth); Modified Date Filed on 10/31/2019 (ztth). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DOE v. CHUNG | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JANE DOE | |
| Represented By: | Steven J. Kelly |
| Represented By: | Christine Dunn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DAVID CHUNG | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
