BUZZFEED INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
| BUZZFEED INC. |
| U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 1:2019cv03295 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (Field, Brian)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, for good cause shown, that Defendants' #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer, and file a joint proposed schedule for briefing or disclosure by January 3, 2020. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 12/18/2019. (lctjk1)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon further review of the District's Bar Member records, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court's December 16, 2019 Minute Order is VACATED. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 12/17/2019. (lctjk1)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/13/2019. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/13/2019. (Topic, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 6
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/13/2019. (Topic, Matthew)
|
|
VACATED PURSUANT TO ORDER FILED 12/17/2019..... MINUTE ORDER: It does not appear from the filings in this case that Plaintiff's counsel is a member of this Court's bar. The Court therefore ORDERS counsel to consult Local Rule 83.2 and proceed accordingly. Failure to comply with the local rules may result in dismissal of the case. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 12/16/2019. (lctjk1) Modified on 12/18/2019 (zkh).
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT.(Field, Brian)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court in this FOIA case are a complaint and an answer. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer, and file a joint proposed schedule for briefing or disclosure by December 30, 2019. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 12/13/2019. (lctjk1)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zmc)
|
|
Filing 3
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by BUZZFEED INC. (Topic, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Topic on behalf of BUZZFEED INC. (Topic, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6496820) filed by BUZZFEED INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Civil Cover Sheet, #18 Summons)(Topic, Matthew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
