NARAYAN et al v. KOUMANS
Plaintiff: SOUNDARYA LIPIKA ANASURYA, RADHIKA NARAYAN and HARSHADA PRAKASH KALE
Defendant: MARK KOUMANS
Case Number: 1:2019cv03491
Filed: November 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Richard J Leon
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 12/16/2019. (lcrjl1)
December 3, 2019 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/2/2019. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 1/31/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of service)(Banias, Bradley)
November 22, 2019 NOTICE OF ERROR re #3 Notice of Appearance; emailed to jdwasden@economic-immigration.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Counsel must update address in pacer. (zeg, )
November 21, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to MARK KOUMANS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrdj)
November 21, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (zrdj)
November 20, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan D. Wasden on behalf of SOUNDARYA LIPIKA ANASURYA, RADHIKA NARAYAN, HARSHADA PRAKASH KALE (Wasden, Jonathan)
November 20, 2019 Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by SOUNDARYA LIPIKA ANASURYA, RADHIKA NARAYAN, HARSHADA PRAKASH KALE (Banias, Bradley)
November 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARK KOUMANS ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6579552) filed by RADHIKA NARAYAN, SOUNDARYA LIPIKA ANASURYA, HARSHADA PRAKASH KALE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons USCIS, #3 Summons USAO, #4 Summons USAG)(Banias, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NARAYAN et al v. KOUMANS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SOUNDARYA LIPIKA ANASURYA
Represented By: Bradley Bruce Banias
Represented By: Jonathan D. Wasden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RADHIKA NARAYAN
Represented By: Bradley Bruce Banias
Represented By: Jonathan D. Wasden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HARSHADA PRAKASH KALE
Represented By: Bradley Bruce Banias
Represented By: Jonathan D. Wasden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK KOUMANS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?