DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY et al
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY |
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. |
1:2019cv03516 |
November 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Paul L Friedman |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. § 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER pursuant to #16 the parties' stipulated request to extend time. Defendants shall respond to the amended complaint on or before February 7, 2020. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on December 23, 2019. (lcplf1) |
Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Amended Complaint by Union Pacific Railroad Company, BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc. by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY. (Waldin, Benjamin) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 2/7/2020, (tj) |
Filing 15 Approved Stipulated Protective Order governing pretrial disclosure and use by the parties of all documents, ESI, testimony and other information during discovery. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on December 19, 2019. (MA) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Stipulated Protective Order by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Stipulated Protective Order)(Waldin, Benjamin) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY waiver sent on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020. (Waldin, Benjamin) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. waiver sent on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020. (Waldin, Benjamin) |
Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY served on 12/3/2019, answer due 12/24/2019 (Waldin, Benjamin) |
Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY served on 12/3/2019, answer due 12/24/2019 (Waldin, Benjamin) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically for Amended Complaint as to CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.. (ztd) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. with Jury Demand filed by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Summons TO CSX Transportation, Inc.)(Waldin, Benjamin) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Waldin on behalf of DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY (Waldin, Benjamin) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc) |
Filing 5 ERRATA Regarding Complaint (ECF No. 1) by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Corrected Complaint (correcting caption and signature block))(Walsh, Ryan) |
Case Assigned to Judge Paul L. Friedman. (zrdj) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Walsh on behalf of DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY (Walsh, Ryan) |
Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY (Walsh, Ryan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY. Case related to Case No. 1:07-mc-00489 AND OTHERS. (Walsh, Ryan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6584595) filed by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to BNSF Railway Company, #3 Summons to Norfolk Southern Railway Company, #4 Summons to Union Pacific Railroad Company)(Walsh, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.