MANNEPULI v. WOLF et al
DINESH BABU MANNEPULI |
LAURA ZUCHOWSKI, CHAD WOLF, KENNETH CUCCINELLI, WILLIAM P. BARR, MARK KOUMANS, DONALD NEUFELD and CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY |
1:2019cv03639 |
December 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Beryl A Howell |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by DINESH BABU MANNEPULI re #3 Order . (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by DINESH BABU MANNEPULI re #2 Summons Issued Electronically as to AUSA Document 2-1. (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. LAURA ZUCHOWSKI served on 12/16/2019 (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DONALD NEUFELD served on 12/16/2019 (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MARK KOUMANS served on 12/16/2019 (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. KENNETH CUCCINELLI served on 12/16/2019 (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY served on 12/16/2019 (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CHAD WOLF served on 12/16/2019 (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/16/2019. (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/16/2019. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/14/2020. (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on December 9, 2019. (lcbah4) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH CUCCINELLI, MARK KOUMANS, DONALD NEUFELD, CHAD WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, LAURA ZUCHOWSKI, and U.S. Attorney. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (adh, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH CUCCINELLI, MARK KOUMANS, DONALD NEUFELD, CHAD WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, LAURA ZUCHOWSKI ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6622269) filed by DINESH BABU MANNEPULI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Table, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Civil Cover Sheet, #17 Summons for Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Chad Wolf, #18 Summons for U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr, #19 Summons for FBI Director Christopher Wray, #20 Summons for Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Kenneth Cuccinelli, #21 Summons for Deputy Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Mark Koumans, #22 Summons for Associate Director, Service Center Operations, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Donald Neufeld, #23 Summons for Director, Vermont Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Laura Zuchowski, #24 Summons for Civil Process Clerk, U.S. Attorney)(Rosen, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.