GREENHOW v. MODLEY
| Terrence Greenhow |
| DEPARTMENT OF NAVY and THOMAS B. MODLEY |
| 1:2019cv03674 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Ketanji Brown Jackson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER AND GUIDELINES APPLICABLE TO FOIA CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON. The Court will hold the parties and counsel responsible for following these directives, and parties and counsel should pay particular attention to the Court's instructions for processing and production of records, batching motions, and filing exhibits. Failure to adhere to this Order may, when appropriate, result the imposition of sanctions and/or sua sponte denial of non-conforming motions. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 12/10/2019. (jag)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to THOMAS B. MODLEY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrdj) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. (zrdj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF NAVY with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6631633) filed by Terrence Greenhow. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney, #3 Summons Defendant, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rucker, Donna) Modified on 12/11/2019 to correct receipt number.(ztnr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
