BEGUM v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
| SHAKILA BEGUM |
| U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CONSULATE, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, PAUL W. JONES, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI |
| 1:2019cv03701 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Christopher R Cooper |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Cirino on behalf of All Defendants (Cirino, Paul) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, PAUL W. JONES, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CONSULATE, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrdj) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by SHAKILA BEGUM.(Hacking, James) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (zrdj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6640608) filed by SHAKILA BEGUM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons)(Hacking, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
