BLACK ROCK CITY LLC v. BERNHARDT et al
| BLACK ROCK CITY LLC |
| WINNEMUCCA DISTRICT OFFICE FOR THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, INTERIOR BOARD OF LAND APPEALS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DAVID L. BERNHARDT |
| 1:2019cv03729 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Dabney L Friedrich |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to DAVID L. BERNHARDT, INTERIOR BOARD OF LAND APPEALS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, WINNEMUCCA DISTRICT OFFICE FOR THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrdj)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zrdj)
|
|
Filing 2
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by BLACK ROCK CITY LLC (Petersen, Rafe)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against DAVID L. BERNHARDT, INTERIOR BOARD OF LAND APPEALS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, WINNEMUCCA DISTRICT OFFICE FOR THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6646009) filed by BLACK ROCK CITY LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Petersen, Rafe)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
