PAWLOSKI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: EDWIN PAWLOSKI
Defendant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 1:2019cv03740
Filed: December 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Timothy J Kelly
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: The Court notes that the docket in this case reflects that no summonses have been issued. Plaintiff is advised that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(b), it is his responsibility to present any required summonses to the Clerk of the Court for signature and seal. The plaintiff may obtain copies of the relevant summonses from the Court's website under the tab "pro se help." The summons for a FOIA case is available at https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/Summons-FOIA_2013_FILL.pdf. Plaintiff is further advised that service of summonses and the complaint must be accomplished consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i), which applies to service on the "United States and its Agencies, Corporations, Officers, or Employees." Plaintiff is further advised that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), he must serve Defendants within 90 days of filing the complaint or show good cause for an extension. Failure to serve Defendants within 90 days--here, by March 10, 2020--or show good cause for an extension will result in a mandatory dismissal of this action. Finally, Plaintiff is advised that he must comply with the proof of service requirement of Federal Rule of Civil procedure 4(l)(1). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, in order to avoid a mandatory dismissal of this action, by March 10, 2020, Plaintiff shall either (1) cause process to be served upon Defendants and file proof of service with the Court, or (2) file a motion to enlarge time to serve process and show good cause, if any, for failure to serve process in a timely fashion. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 12/20/2019. (lctjk1)
December 17, 2019 SUMMONS Not Issued as to EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (ztth)
December 16, 2019 Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number: 4616101818. (ztth)
December 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA filed by EDWIN PAWLOSKI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ztth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PAWLOSKI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDWIN PAWLOSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?