BROWN v. BOUNTIFUL BLESSING TEMPLE OF DELIVERANCE et al
| TAMARA NICOLE BROWN |
| BOUNTIFUL BLESSING TEMPLE OF DELIVERANCE, LOUISE PATTERSON, MILTON HAWKINS and CATHERINE HAWKINS |
| 1:2019cv03832 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 01/23/2020. (zmc)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 01/23/2020. (zmc) |
| Filing 3 Consent to Proceed before US Magistrate Judge for All Purposes by TAMARA NICOLE BROWN. (zmd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TAMARA NICOLE BROWN. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BOUNTIFUL BLESSING TEMPLE OF DELIVERANCE, CATHERINE HAWKINS, MILTON HAWKINS, LOUISE PATTERSON with Jury Demand filed by TAMARA NICOLE BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Additional Documents to the Complaint) #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (zmd). |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 12/26/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
