SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
BRIAN SELWAY |
HNLEA NCR, et al. |
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM |
1:2019mc00162 |
September 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Ketanji Brown Jackson |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Receipt on 10/23/2019 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 8:19-cv-03086 sent by District of Maryland. (zrdj) |
Filing 8 Case transferred to the United District Court for the District of Maryland, pursuant to the Court Order entered 10/23/2019. Sent to Court via extrction. (jf) |
![]() |
Filing 6 REPLY to opposition to motion re #1 MOTION to Quash MOTION for Protective Order filed by BRIAN SELWAY. (McAndrew, Patrick) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Information by BRIAN SELWAY (McAndrew, Patrick) |
Filing 4 Memorandum in opposition to #1 MOTION to Quash MOTION for Protective Order filed by HNLEA NCR, et al.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Freedman, John); Modified event and text on 10/15/2019 (ztth). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John Arak Freedman on behalf of HNLEA NCR, et al. (Freedman, John) |
![]() |
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash, MOTION for Protective Order by BRIAN SELWAY (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Text of Proposed Order for Motion to Quash, #4 Text of Proposed Order for Motion for Protective Order)(jf) |
Filing fee received: $ 47.00, receipt number: 4616100727. (jf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.