HARRIS v. WMATA
Plaintiff: PHYLLIS HARRIS
Defendant: WMATA
Case Number: 1:2020cv00008
Filed: January 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Christopher R Cooper
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2020 Filing 14 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WMATA. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Facts, #2 Declaration)(Cuthbertson, James)
February 24, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment by WMATA (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Statement of Facts, #3 Declaration, #4 Declaration, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Cuthbertson, James)
February 10, 2020 Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against WMATA with Jury Demand filed by PHYLLIS HARRIS.(ztd)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #9 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. In light of the fact that Plaintiff had a right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B) to amend her complaint within 21 days of service of Defendant's motion to dismiss and #11 Defendant's concession that it does not object to Plaintiff's right to amend her Complaint as a matter of course, it is hereby ORDERED that #9 Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her complaint is hereby GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that [9-1] Amended Complaint shall be deemed the operative complaint. It is further ORDERED that #8 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Her Complaint is TERMINATED as entered in error. It is further ORDERED that #7 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is DENIED AS MOOT. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to the amended complaint by February 24, 2020. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 2/10/20. (lccrc2) Modified on 2/10/2020 (zlsj).
February 10, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer to Amended Complaint due by 2/24/2020 (lsj)
February 7, 2020 Filing 11 REPLY to opposition to motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by WMATA. (Cuthbertson, James)
January 31, 2020 Filing 10 Memorandum in opposition to re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by PHYLLIS HARRIS. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Haley, Howard)
January 31, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by PHYLLIS HARRIS (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Haley, Howard)
January 29, 2020 NOTICE OF ERROR re #8 Motion to Amend/Correct; emailed to haleyfirm@gmail.com, cc'd 4 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Reminder, if you are electronically filing, your name must appear on the signature line of the document(s) and vice versa. (ztd, )
January 28, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by PHYLLIS HARRIS (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Haley, Howard)
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER finding as moot #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, in light of Defendant's filing of #7 Motion to Dismiss on January 17, 2020. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 1/21/20. (lccrc2)
January 17, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by WMATA (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Cuthbertson, James) Modified on 1/21/2020 (ztd).
January 13, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by James Douglas Cuthbertson on behalf of WMATA (Cuthbertson, James)
January 10, 2020 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by WMATA (Janey, Neal)
January 7, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Howard E. E. Haley, IV on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Haley, Howard)
January 3, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal,, (adh, )
January 3, 2020 Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by WMATA (Janey, Neal)
January 3, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2019 CA 007999 B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADCDC-6698195 filed by WMATA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing of Pleadings, #3 Superior Court Documents Sup. Ct. Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Superior Court Documents Complaint, #5 Superior Court Documents Initial Order & Addendum, #6 Superior Court Documents Summons)(Janey, Neal) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/3/2020) (adh, ).
January 3, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (adh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARRIS v. WMATA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHYLLIS HARRIS
Represented By: Dawn R. Anderson-Jackson
Represented By: Howard E. E. Haley, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WMATA
Represented By: Neal Marcellas Janey, Jr.
Represented By: James Douglas Cuthbertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?