HUCKS v. SAUL et al
| MELVIN HUCKS |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2020cv00019 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANDREW M. SAUL served on 2/20/2020, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 2/24/2020. (eg) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (3) Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zmd) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on February 10, 2020. (lccjn3)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zmc) |
|
Filing 3
FIAT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. "Leave to file without prepayment of costs GRANTED." Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 01/23/2020. (zmc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MELVIN HUCKS (zmc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL filed by MELVIN HUCKS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(zmc) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 01/03/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
