OKEREKE v. TORRUELLA et al
PRECIOUS OKEREKE |
GERALD E. LYNCH, WILLIAM J. KAYATTA, JR., JEFFREY R. HOWARD, JUAN R. TORRUELLA, INDIRA TALWANI, OJETTA R. THOMPSON and DAVID J. BARRON |
1:2020cv00042 |
January 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION for Permission to Use Post Office Box by PRECIOUS OKEREKE (zmc) |
Filing 3 ORDER that within 30 days from the filing date of this order, Plaintiff shall file either an amended complaint listing plaintiff's full residence address or a separate motion setting forth reasons to use a P.O. Box address. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order within the time provided may result in dismissal of the case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 01/23/2020. (zmc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by PRECIOUS OKEREKE. (zmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DAVID J. BARRON, JEFFREY R. HOWARD, WILLIAM J. KAYATTA, JR, GERALD E. LYNCH, INDIRA TALWANI, OJETTA R. THOMPSON, JUAN R. TORRUELLA with Jury Demand filed by PRECIOUS OKEREKE. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1 Through 3, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (zmd) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 1/3/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.