EDWARDS v. STATE OF ARIZONA et al
| STEPHEN S. EDWARDS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF ARIZONA |
| 1:2020cv00054 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order advising Plaintiff to respond by March 5, 2020, to Defendant's #4 Motion to Dismiss or risk dismissal of the case. See Order for details. The Clerk's Office is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at the address listed on the docket. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 2/10/2020. (lctjk1)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by STATE OF ARIZONA (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1a, #2 Exhibit 1b, #3 Exhibit 2-10)(Ensign, Drew) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. STATE OF ARIZONA served on 1/16/2020. (ztth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE and Consent to Receive Electronic Notifications by STEPHEN S. EDWARDS. (ztth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STATE OF ARIZONA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616102019) with Jury Demand filed by STEPHEN S. EDWARDS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ztth) |
| Summons (2) Issued as to STATE OF ARIZONA and U.S. Attorney General. (ztth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
