CORTEZ v. ALFAISAL et al
| DARLENE CORTEZ |
| MARYPAT WRIGHT, RICK SCOTT, SARA ALMALIK, CASSIDY SOVA, KEVIN WRIGHT, FARED MANPUR, TERRENCE NOLAN, JANE SCOTT, C.P. MOHAMMED BIN SALMAN BIN ABDUL AZZIZ ALSAUD, TOM WRIGHT, LOULOUA ALSABAH, FADA ALFALAH, ALWALEED BIN TALAL BIN ABDUL AZZIZ ALSAUD, LOUWA ALFAISAL and KATHLEEN NOLAN EDWARDS |
| 1:2020cv00089 |
| January 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Ordered that the #2 application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 1/31/2020. (zrdj)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 1/31/2020. (zrdj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DARLENE CORTEZ. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALL DEFENDANTS with Jury Demand filed by DARLENE CORTEZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (zmd) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 1/10/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
